#10 Tier Requirements | CTYTNS
Bài trước bạn đã assess tier phù hợp.
Bài này explain: Mỗi tier expect gì từ paper của bạn?
Q4 Requirements
Contribution level: Incremental
Gap type: Contextual (Level 1-2) thường accepted
What they look for:
- Methodologically sound (không cần advanced)
- Clear research questions
- Adequate sample size
- Correct application of basic methods
- Some practical implications
What's NOT required:
- Novel theoretical contribution
- Advanced methodologies
- Large-scale studies
Typical paper: "Replicating established findings in new context"
Q3 Requirements
Contribution level: Moderate
Gap type: Contextual + Empirical (Level 2-3)
What they look for:
- Everything Q4 requires, PLUS:
- Clearer theoretical grounding
- Better articulated contribution
- More rigorous methods
- Comprehensive literature review
- Practical AND theoretical implications
What's NOT required:
- Groundbreaking theory
- Very large samples
- Multiple studies
Typical paper: "Extending theory to new context with nuanced findings"
Q2 Requirements
Contribution level: Significant
Gap type: Empirical + Methodological (Level 3-4)
What they look for:
- Everything Q3 requires, PLUS:
- Strong theoretical contribution
- Methodological rigor (often SEM, experiments)
- Larger, more diverse samples
- Multiple robustness checks
- Clear positioning against existing literature
What's NOT required:
- Paradigm-shifting findings
- Extremely large samples
Typical paper: "Developing new constructs or scales"
Q1 Requirements
Contribution level: Major
Gap type: Methodological + Theoretical (Level 4)
What they look for:
- Everything Q2 requires, PLUS:
- Significant theoretical advancement
- Often multiple studies
- Exceptional rigor
- Comprehensive, nuanced argumentation
- Clear impact on future research direction
Common reasons for Q1 rejection:
- "Contribution not sufficient for this journal"
- "Theoretical development needs more work"
- "Findings not novel enough"
Typical paper: "New theoretical framework"
So sánh nhanh
| Aspect | Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gap level | 1-2 | 2-3 | 3-4 | 4 |
| Theory | Apply | Apply + Extend | Extend + Challenge | Develop |
| Method | Basic | Solid | Rigorous | Exceptional |
| Sample | Adequate | Good | Large | Multiple/Diverse |
| Contribution | Incremental | Moderate | Significant | Major |
Implications for Research Design
Targeting Q4:
- Focus on clean execution
- Contextual gap is fine
- Basic quantitative methods work
- Don't over-complicate
Targeting Q3:
- Need clearer theoretical story
- Consider empirical gap
- Methods should be solid
- Literature review needs depth
Targeting Q2:
- Theoretical contribution is key
- Methods must be rigorous
- Consider multiple studies or robustness checks
- Position clearly against existing work
Targeting Q1:
- Theory development is essential
- Multiple studies often expected
- Exceptional rigor throughout
- Clear field-level impact
Cho Team Instant Cereal
Exercise:
Dựa trên tier assessment từ bài #9:
- Xác định target tier cho team project
- Review requirements của tier đó
- Gap check: Team đã meet những requirements nào? Còn thiếu gì?
Format:
Target tier: Q___
Requirements checklist:
- [ ] Appropriate gap level
- [ ] Adequate theoretical grounding
- [ ] Suitable methodology planned
- [ ] Resources for required sample size
- [ ] Writing capability
Missing/Need to develop:
1. ___
2. ___Key takeaway
Mỗi tier có rules riêng. Know the rules before you play. Design research to match tier requirements. Đừng under-deliver cho Q1, đừng over-engineer cho Q4.
Bài tiếp theo: #11 Predatory Journals
Series: Cách Tìm Ý Tưởng Nghiên Cứu • Bài #10